Many market observers expect the crypto markets will have sharp spikes up and down this year compared to 2017.A few weeks ago the bitcoin traded at more than $20,000, and at the end of 2017 the price dropped to around $11,000. This was followed by a rebound again, with bitcoin hitting about $16,500 on Saturday.
Meltem Demirors, director of the Digital Currency Group — an investment company which invests in currencies and crypto blockchain businesses — believes renewed momentum is on its way as Wall Street bonus season hits.
“If the bonuses of Wall Street on January 15 on the bank accounts countries, we will see a buying frenzy on the crypto market of epic ” Demirors wrote on Twitter earlier this year.
The traditional start of the year is a time when Wall Street traders can exert influence with their bonus payments, as many traders gamble with their extra income.
Mid-January bonuses likely clocked in at approximately $138,000, as can be deduced from calculations of the New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli.Two decades ago, The New York Times wrote about about car salesmen in New York who significantly benefited from bonuses on Wall Street.
A certified financial planner explains just how risky of an investment
“They are young, aggressive people who are able to make decisions spontaneously,” the newspaper quoted a car salesman saying at the time. “They come to see what’s in inventory, and when they receive their bonus checks bingo.”
Meltem Demirors, director of the Digital Currency Group — an investment company which invests in currencies and crypto blockchain businesses — believes renewed momentum is on its way as Wall Street bonus season hits.
“If the bonuses of Wall Street on January 15 on the bank accounts countries, we will see a buying frenzy on the crypto market of epic ” Demirors wrote on Twitter earlier this year.
The manager wrote on an internal post, “I am thinking of something like a google doc that accepts comments, and which calls out those googlers that are unsupportive of diversity,” she wrote.
The lawsuit shows that in at least one case, a manager (a white woman), was contemplating keeping some kind of actual, public list of employee names.
She wondered, in the post, whether special “trials” should be held for employees nominated for the list, to determine whether they belonged on it or not.
Whether expressing anti-diversity sentiments at a workplace is a protected “conservative viewpoint” or, rather, a form of bigotry that actually creates a hostile environment is at the heart of the case — and it reflects a broader debate gripping the country under the divisive presidency of Donald Trump.
